into the west

Showing posts with label ecocriticism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ecocriticism. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

autoroute 20; salt fish girl

On my way to my grandmother's funeral last Wednesday, somewhere between Montreal and Rimouski, I waded through Larissa Lai's Salt Fish Girl. Indeed, reading it reminded me in many ways of the Hass review excerpt in the header of this blog: the waters flowing through the text's (post)apocalypse, coupled with its faintly surreal temporal but recognizable social structures, made the experience of reading it through rather like stepping into a(n) (un)familiar element, teeming with bioengineered life.

In working on a response for a class, though, I found that the element was remarkably difficult to sublimate (or condense), to translate into any sort of consistent coherence. At first, I tried to read it in response to an epigraph pulled from Spider Robinson's Telempath, fixating as many of the book's reviewers have on its characterizations of and reliance on smell. Because the response was for a class framed by Greg Garrard's notion of apocalypse as an environmental trope, I was looking at each author's approach to smell as characteristic of either the comic or the tragic mode that Garrard describes. Robinson's text, for those of you who might be unfamiliar with it, describes a post-apocalyptic world whose crisis is entirely dependent on the human sense of smell:
It was early afternoon, and the same sunshine that was warming the forests and dorms and work-zones of Fresh Start, my home, seemed to chill the air here, accentuating the barren emptiness of the ruined city. Silence and desolation were all around me as I walked, bleached bones and crumbling brick. Carlson had been efficient, all right; nearly as efficient as the atomic bomb folks used to be so scared of once. It seemed as though I were in some immense devil's autoclave, that ignored filth and grime but grimly scrubbed out life of any kind….
Carlson had said one word to me that afternoon, and the word was "Hyperosmia."
Within forty-eight hours every man, woman and child left alive on earth possessed a sense of smell approximately a hundred times more efficient than that of any wolf that ever howled.
During those forty-eight hours, a little less than a fifth of the planet's population perished, by whatever means they could devise, and every city in the world spilled its remaining life into the surrounding countryside. The ancient smell-suppressing system of the human brain collapsed under unbearable demand, overloaded and burned out in an instant.
The great complex behemoth called Modern Civilization ground to a halt in a little less than two days.

Until the very end of the novel, it tends toward a tragic conception of good and evil, and Robinson's protagonist follows a familiar heroic narrative arc. But I was primarily interested in how Lai's text, also fixated on genetically modified human smell—in more than one sense—and with a similar geographic garrison structure (though Robinson's is set against the ruins of NYC and Lai's is primarily the Canadian Pacific Northwest), uses both smell and apocalypse in ways more suited to the comic mode.

Durian is one of the more obvious connections to make to smell, as it in many ways characterizes the novel's future protagonist, Miranda. Its redolence of cat piss and pepper, described as such throughout the novel, clings to this girl from birth, and, in ways that I will leave to Lai to describe, ultimately leads to her initial conception through complicated intersections of culture, gender, interspeciality, and sexuality. But it is her bearing of this symptom that makes Miranda a particularly apt protagonist, as her peculiar relationship with it helps to frame the novel itself as a sort of "dreaming disease," which refers to one of the post-apocalypse effects of genetic modification that insinuate themselves into the lives and landscapes of the human communities, a disease, in many senses, of history and cultural memory that is intimately bound up in the (supposedly contracted) particular scents of those afflicted.

This experience of the novel as dream-disease is heightened by its fluidity (and sometimes alien and seemingly deliberately alienating) in chronology and geography, especially as its protagonists are careful to leave questions throughout, especially as to origins and conclusions, weaving a sort of indeterminate cyclicality whose preoccupation is with fragmentation and rebirth, a rebirth which is itself fractional and dynamic. Its unapologetic celebration of the abject, and perhaps also implied criticism of the adherence to a Romantic individual, allows the novel to complicate readers' sympathy with both characters and corporations, landscapes and waterways, and deliberately shifts the naturalization of beauty and the sublime through subtle critiques of cultural assimilation and heteronormativity.

And now, I think I've chattered long enough, so I'll leave you with a taste of Lai's fluid prose that perhaps makes this novel's juxtaposition with Moreau more apt than anticipated:
The sound of footsteps came from around a bend in the corridor. Ian pulled me into a side hallway. Pressed against the wall, I watched another group of Janitors pass, their tired feet scuffing against the floor. In horror I watched their backs as they moved away from us. There were rectangular holes in their uniforms that ran from the tailbone to the base of the neck. The muscle and skin of their backs had been replaced with some kind of transparent silicone composite so that you could see their spines and behind them, their hearts pounding, their livers and kidneys swimming in oceans of blood and gristle. We had studied anatomy at school. I could see that the organs had been shifted, had been carefully arranged like stones in a formal garden, mimicking the asymmetrical aesthetics of nature, but with human intention. (76-77)

Thursday, April 29, 2010

the project

Though "a very good place to start," I find the very beginning is often redefined by its conclusion, so this post will likely grow and change as much as the rest of the blog itself. For now, introductions: I'm a brand new University of Victoria "alumnus," prepared with my shining, as-yet nonexistent English B.A., and it's summer. In the past, I've had classes to keep me reading and focused through the summers, and preparation for the following semester was enforcedly harried and short.

This, year, though, I'm moving to Calgary to start my M.A. in English, and I've got a lot to read before I get there. Further, I've been in Victoria for four years and seen not much more of Vancouver Island than the Victoria Zen Centre's Zendo in Sooke, B.C. and the overwhelming array of fabulous used book stores in Sidney, B.C. But there's a lot more of the island to explore—indeed, even in Victoria there are places like my front yard which, until the last week or so, I had spent no time in.

Now, I propose rectifying this situation (which is quite at odds with someone whose claimed academic interest in ecocriticism and regional studies implies a larger interest in the environments of regions physically and as written) by using sustainable transportation methods to get to local places I have and haven't been and read environmental literature and nonfiction there. Rather than reviews, I will post reflections, inspired by as-yet unsolidified aspects of these experiences. Whether I'm writing about the literature, the spaces, the literature in these spaces, or the trips to and from, I'll at least be confronting ecocriticism's role in the environment.

Fellow students and non-academics alike are always a bit stymied by the concept of ecocriticism when I mention it in passing. One memorable response stumped me (pun not originally intended): "What, do you just hate trees or something? Point out all their flaws?" It stumped me because, contrary to my initial reaction, I realized that this assumption wasn't entirely wrong—I spend a fair amount of my time criticizing the way trees are represented, and flowers, oceans and rivers, non-human and human animals. I do point out their flaws, insofar as I try to identify the potentially environmentally hazardous assumptions contained in their descriptions. I read to find how these assumptions are produced and reproduced in the hopes of eventually identifying ways in which they can be changed so that sustainability becomes, problematic punned cliche aside, second nature. Scott Slovic characterizes the role of ecocriticism as "contextualization and synthesis" (Going Away to Think 34). He writes of his experience hiking and writing with nature writer Rick Bass that he "stood back and watched Rick watch the world." I like this characterization. For this project, I'll watch Scott watch Rick watch the world, and try to watch Naomi watching Scott watching Rick watch the world around my home.

Instead of going away to think, I'll stick around here and read.